Civic simulation for approval voting and policy clarity

Ascent helps communities test richer ways to vote before changing the real world.

The project models elections, expressive ratings, and issue positions in one place so researchers, organizers, and donors can study how voter choice, candidate coalitions, and policy responsibility actually interact.

Explore the Mountain DemoAbout Approval VotingFor Philanthropic Partners

0

Active elections

4733

Offices modeled

10

Topics tracked

40

Issues connected

Three Ways that

Expressive Voting turns elections into a collaboration.

Assent

The process is focused on agreement, not compromise. You can be specific about where you stand.

Ascent

Candidates who work hard can climb to the top, even without a head start.

The Scent

Politicians can finally see, almost in exact detail, which of their ideas are truly popular. And with that reassurance, they are able to be precise when saying what they'd change.

Designed for cross-partisan scrutiny

The framing stays civic and practical, not partisan.

Voter agency

People can express layered preferences instead of being forced into a single strategic choice.

Institutional fit

The system links policy claims back to real offices and jurisdictions, which helps keep promises legible.

Transparent experimentation

Mock elections and simulation data let communities explore reforms without pretending theory is enough.

Local usefulness

The data model is structured around places, offices, and residents, which keeps the project grounded in administration.

Current workspace

Active election spaces ready for exploration.

No active races are loaded yet.

The supporting data model is already in place, so the next step is to seed or model a live example and use the mountain interface to walk people through it.

Browse Election DataReview Jurisdictions